![]() ![]() If you later find out the codec you chose isn't the best for your needs, you can just transcompress to another format, without risk of losing quality. En fin, this is not a matter worth getting too worked up about. Someone wanting portable support would use FLAC or ALAC, and so on. Another user, looking for the very highest compression available, would go with OptimFROG. ![]() Some people take into consideration only compression performance when choosing a codec, but as the following table and article shows, there are several other features worth taking into consideration when making a choice.įor example, users wanting good multiplatform compatibility and robustness (e.g., people sharing live recordings) would favour WavPack or FLAC. Given the enormous number of lossless audio compressor choices available, it is a very difficult task to choose the one most suited for each person's needs. 3.8 Windows Media Audio Lossless (WMAL).3.5 Tom's verlustfreier Audiokompressor (TAK). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |